Scout — Hotel wireframes

H1 · Listing Composer

scout.app/hotel/listings/new Hotel Bairro Alto · Lisbon

New listing · May 2026 inventory

8 unsold room-nights flagged by your PMS · 14-day window

Inventory · May

M T W T F S S · · · 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ·

PMS-flagged risk In this listing

3 room-nights selected · May 14–17 · superior double × 2 · Chiado floor

Floor curve · what you'll accept by day

Floor (today, T-3)€124

Floor (T-1)€115

Ceiling€185

Slope−4%/day after T-7

H2 · Auction Ledger · post-clear audit pair

scout.app/hotel/ledger/2026-05 Hotel Bairro Alto · May 2026

Auction ledger · May 2026

Every clear, with the customer narrative shown for parity. Audit yield performance or resolve disputes here.

Clears this month12

Lift vs base floor+€127/ night avg

Win rate (90d)62%

Disputes0

Case file · expanded

AUC-2026-0517-BAR-019

May 14–17 · Superior double · Chiado floor

Cleared 11:43 · Wed May 7 · 4 agents in the room · sealed bids

Listing window14d → cleared at T-7

Your floor at clear€124 · down from €185 ceiling

Winning bid€131 / night

Bids submitted3 active · 1 withdrew

Customer taste-vector match78% · top quartile

Refundable untilMay 9

Behavioural rule that fired

"Drop floor 8% if Saturday inventory unsold by Wed" Triggered Wed 09:14 · floor moved €135 → €124 · auction cleared 2h 29m later.

Hotel net€131 / n

Vs. base floor+€7 / n

Scout fee to hotel€0

Auction	Dates	Bid	Floor	Lift	Match
AUC-…0517-019	May 14–17	€131	€124	+€7	78%	Open
AUC-…0512-008	May 9–11	€118	€115	+€3	61%	Open
AUC-…0506-002	May 1–4	€146	€129	+€17	91%	Open
AUC-…0429-014	Apr 28–May 2	€122	€122	+€0	54%	Open

H3 · Live Mandates Dashboard · in-flight view

scout.app/hotel/dashboard Hotel Bairro Alto · 11:43 · live

Active listings · in market right now

What agents are doing with your inventory. Aggregate signals only — never individual mandate contents.

Listings in market

Agents evaluating

11across all listings

Bids today

3· 1 cleared

Listings at risk

1· no bids T-2

Listing	Window	Floor now	Agents	Status
May 14–17 · superior double Chiado · 3 nights · refundable	T-7 of 14	€124	4	Bid cleared 11:43
May 18–20 · deluxe king Bairro Alto · 2 nights · weekend	T-11 of 14	€168	3	2 bids active
May 21–24 · superior twin Chiado · 3 nights · midweek	T-14 of 14	€185	2	Just listed
May 9–11 · classic double Bairro Alto · 2 nights · weekend	T-2 of 14	€115	2	No clear at T-2

Triggers fired in the last 24h

11:43 May 14–17 · "Drop floor 8% if Saturday inventory unsold by Wed" fired · floor moved €135 → €124 · cleared 2h 29m later.

09:14 May 9–11 · listing at T-2 with no bids · suggested action: drop floor 12% or extend window 24h.

H4 · Indicative Floor · zero-data calibration mechanism

scout.app/hotel/calibration Lisbon market · day 42 of 90

Indicative floor · zero-data calibration

Active until your city has 50 closings of historical data. Phases out automatically.

Your indicative floor band · Lisbon

Committed floor (low)€118 / night

Committed floor (high)€148 / night

Committed window90 days · auto phase-out

Adjust frequencyOnce / 14 days

Pricing guarantee · customer side

StatusActive for first 90 days

CoverageRefund customer if Mara overshoots band

Cost to hotel€0 — Scout absorbs

Trigger so far0 customer-side refunds in Lisbon

H5 · Radar Audit · quality gate, hotel-facing view

scout.app/hotel/radar Hotel Bairro Alto · 1 active flag

Radar audit · last 30 days

Repeated flags trigger automated deprioritisation across all agent searches. No human review at scale.

Radar score

Current score72 / 100 · caution

30-day trend↓ from 91

Flags this period2 raised · 1 active

DeprioritisationNone yet · threshold 60

Active flag detail

TypeFloor manipulation · suspected

DetectedMay 3 · 14:22

BehaviourFloor moved €120 → €180 within 4h, 12h before window close

Customer impact3 mandates withdrew · 1 missed clearance

H6 · Soft-Brand Parity Guard · Year-2 chain-bridge surface

scout.app/hotel/parity Lisbon Autograph · soft-brand pilot

Parity guard · pre-listing checklist

Brand corporate flagged Scout discovery to legal in Q1. This surface keeps property-level listings out of public comparison engines.

Parity exposure check

Listing visibilityScout app only · sealed

Public comparison enginesNot eligible · Kayak / Booking blocked

Brand name displayedHidden until customer wins

Public-rate parityMaintained — BAR unchanged

Bid sealing audit

Bid amountNever appears in marketing or social channels

Customer proof cardHides floor · shows savings only

Hotel ledgerVisible only to your RM team

Aggregate brand reportQuarterly · share-of-mix only

H1 · Listing Composer. The hotel UI's primitive is the yield curve, not a flat rate. Hotels already think this way internally — Scout becomes a channel that speaks RM language rather than asking them to take a price. Behavioural rules add conditional intelligence so the floor stays secret in practice; a flat floor leaks in two queries, a curve with conditionals can't be reverse-engineered from outside.

The right rail's live signal shows aggregate interest, not individual mandate contents. Hotels see how many agents are evaluating and what comp-set rooms cleared at — never the taste-vectors of specific customers.

H2 · Auction Ledger. The same auction event produces two receipts. The hotel sees their floor, the rule that fired, and lift vs. base floor — the data they need to audit yield management and resolve any dispute. The customer sees savings vs. public benchmark, anonymous competition stats, and mandate-met chips — the proof they need to trust the system.

Showing both side-by-side is the integrity primitive: each side confirms the same event without exposing what should stay private to the other party.

H3 · Live Mandates Dashboard. The in-flight view. KPIs sit at the top — listings in market, agents evaluating, bids today, listings at risk. The table pairs each listing with a 7-day floor sparkline, current floor, agent count, and a temperature meter.

Crucially, the hotel never sees which agents, what they bid, or which mandates — only aggregate counts and outcomes. That asymmetry is the secrecy guarantee that makes hotels list at all.

H4 · Indicative Floor. Zero-data calibration scaffolding. Hotels commit an indicative band for the first 90 days while Scout accumulates closing history; the pricing guarantee absorbs customer-side mispricing risk so early users aren't paying the cost of system noise.

Indicative floors phase out automatically at 50 closings per city, replaced by an algorithmic estimate. The honest framing is built into the surface — the band is calibration, not a permanent feature. This is the move that lets Day-1 supply commit before they have data to trust, without pushing the discovery risk onto customers.

H5 · Radar Audit. The quality-gate hotel-facing view. Radar flags benchmark manipulation and quality issues, surfacing the exact behaviour that triggered each flag (e.g. "floor moved €120 → €180 within 4h, 12h before window close").

Repeated flags trigger automated deprioritisation across all agent searches — no human review at scale. The structured appeal path (RM justification, comp-set, 30-day decay) prevents Radar from becoming opaque enforcement. The supply you can reach erodes by design with repeated true positives.

H6 · Soft-Brand Parity Guard. The Year-2 chain-bridge surface. Soft-brand properties (Autograph, JdV, Curio, Tribute) where the GM retains pricing authority. The parity guard keeps Scout listings out of public comparison engines — the corporate distribution-desk concern that gates whether chain-affiliated supply works at all.

Bid amounts never appear in marketing channels; brand name hidden until customer wins; public-rate parity maintained. Property-level GM authority + Scout-side audit + monthly share-of-mix reporting (capped at 8%) are the three guardrails that make the chain bridge possible without violating brand-protection economics. This guardrail isn't theoretical — it determines whether Marriott / Hyatt / Hilton corporate distribution can accept Scout as a channel.